RegulCrypto is run as a small, focused editorial operation rather than a content factory. We deliberately stay small to maintain quality control and editorial independence. Here is who is behind the content.

Our Editorial Roles

How We Work

Team Size: Intentionally Small

We do not employ a content farm. Our small team allows tight editorial control, faster updates when crypto reality changes, and consistent voice across the site. The downside: we cover fewer exchanges than larger sites. The upside: every piece we publish is hand-tested, not assembled from press releases.

Decision-Making

Rankings, methodology updates, and editorial direction are decided by group consensus among the editorial team. No single person can unilaterally change a ranking — this prevents both bad-faith manipulation and well-intentioned mistakes.

Outside Contributions

We occasionally publish guest contributions from credentialed crypto experts — but only when topics fall outside our core competencies (e.g., specific country tax law). All guest content is clearly marked, fact-checked by our editorial team, and never includes affiliate links inserted by the contributor.

Our Backgrounds

Collectively, our team has experience in:

• Active crypto trading since 2017 across multiple exchanges
• Quantitative finance and derivatives mathematics
• Software engineering (frontend, backend, mobile)
• Tax law in multiple jurisdictions (USA, UK, Canada, Germany, Spain)
• Independent journalism and editorial standards
• Security research (smart contract audits, exchange security analysis)

We do not claim to be the most credentialed crypto researchers on the internet — we just claim to be honest, rigorous, and willing to update when we are wrong.

Why Pseudonymous?

You will notice we do not list specific names or photos for our team members. This is intentional and common in crypto editorial spaces for several reasons:

• Doxxing risk: Crypto researchers who criticise specific exchanges have faced harassment, threats, and worse. Pseudonymous editorial protects team members.
• Conflict avoidance: Team members may also work in adjacent industries where public identification could create real or perceived conflicts of interest.
• Focus on the work: Without “celebrity author” branding, readers focus on the content quality rather than the author’s social profile.

This choice is a trade-off. It costs us some E-E-A-T (Expertise/Experience/Authoritativeness/Trust) signals that Google might otherwise reward. We accept that cost in exchange for editorial independence.

If you need to verify our claims independently, our methodology page lays out exactly how we score and test exchanges. Our work is checkable against your own data.

Editorial Standards

We hold ourselves to these standards on every published piece:

1. Accuracy first. Wrong data is worse than no data. We verify before publishing.
2. Cite sources. Major claims link to primary sources (exchange fee pages, regulatory authorities, etc.).
3. Update when wrong. If a reader proves a claim is incorrect, we correct it within 48 hours.
4. Disclose conflicts. Affiliate relationships are flagged at every CTA.
5. No manipulation. We do not write hyperbolic headlines, fake urgency, or scare tactics to drive signups.

Tips, Corrections, Press Inquiries

Reach out via the Contact page. We read every email and prioritise:

• Factual corrections (highest priority)
• Tip-offs about exchange security incidents or regulatory actions
• Reader questions that reveal gaps in our coverage
• Partnership and media inquiries

Read Next

• About RegulCrypto
• Audit Methodology
• Affiliate Disclosure
• Contact Us